环空压力对高温高压井固井二界面接触应力变化的影响

doi:10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.05.10

钻采工艺 ›› 2020, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 34-37.DOI: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.05.10

环空压力对高温高压井固井二界面接触应力变化的影响

黄鹏¹, 杨焕强¹, 黄志强¹, 曲路路¹, 吴江²

1长江大学石油工程学院 2中海石油（中国）有限公司湛江分公司

出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-09-25
通讯作者: 杨焕强
作者简介:黄鹏( 1991 - ) , 博士研究生, 现就读于长江大学石油工程学院, 主要从事井筒完整性评价及固井工艺研究工作。地址: (430100) 湖北武汉蔡甸区大学路 111 号长江大学石油工程学院, 电话: 13163375568, E - mail: huangp1688 @ 126. com
基金资助:
中海油重点攻关项目“ 莺琼盆地高温高压钻完井液?固井工艺研究与应用” ( 编号: CNOOC - KJ 135 ZDXM 24 LTD ZJ 02) 。

Effect of Annulus Pressure on Change of Contact Stress at the Two Interfaces of Cementing in High Temperature and High Pressure Wells

HUANG Peng¹, YANG Huanqiang¹, HUANG Zhiqiang¹, QU Lulu¹, WU Jiang²

1 . College of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China; 2. CNOOC China Limited, Zhanjiang Branch, Zhanjiang 524000, China

Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对高温高压井水泥浆固化过程中环空压力变化可能引起水泥环密封失效的问题，基于全尺寸高温高压水泥环应力传递实验装置，根据厚壁圆筒理论，提出了一种测量井下高温、高压条件下水泥环二界面接触应力的实验方法，开展了不同环空压力养护和不同环空压力变化对固井二界面接触应力的影响实验。实验结果表明：其他条件不变，在养护时间168ｈ，随着养护时环空压力越大，最终水泥浆凝固后固井二界面的接触应力越大，最大为 21MPa；针对五组养护好的试件，环空压力从12 MPa卸载，随着环空压力卸载的越多，水泥环两界面的接触应力就越大，当环空压力从 12MPa直接降到 0MPa时，水泥环第一界面处接触应力达到最大22.7 MPa，水泥环第二界面处接触应力达到最大21.84MPa，此时水泥环两界面处径向应力也都达到了最大。该研究结果可以现场指导用多大的环空压力对注水泥固井过程中来的油井水泥环进行养护，以及开发后期要避免环空压力的较大的变化引起水泥环密封失效问题。

关键词: 高温高压, 环空压力, 应力传递, 接触应力, 密封完整性, 固井二界面

Abstract:

In order to solve the problem that the change of annulus pressure during cement slurry curing in high temperature and high pressure wells may cause the failure of cement sheath seal, based on the developed high temperature and high pressure cement sheath stress transfer experimental device, and according to the thick-wall cylinder theory, an experimental method is proposed to simulate the stress transfer during cement sheath curing under high temperature and high pressure conditions underground. The effects of different annulus pressure curing and different annulus pressure changes on cementing interfaces contact stress were studied. The experimental results show that when the other conditions are not changed and the curing time is 168h, the greater the annulus pressure is, the greater the contact stress is at two interfaces after the final cement slurry solidifies, the maximum is 21 MPa. For five groups of cured specimens, the annulus pressure is unloaded from 12MPa. The more the annulus pressure is unloaded, the greater the contact stress of two interfaces of cementing is. The maximum contact stress at the first interface of cement sheath is 22. 7mpa when the annulus pressure is dropped from 12 MPa to 0 MPa, and the maximum contact stress at the second interface of cement sheath is 21.4 MPa. At this time, the radial stress at the two interfaces of cement sheath reaches the maximum. The research results can be used to guide how much annulus pressure is used to cure oil well cement sheath in the process of cement injection and well cementing, and avoid the failure of cement annulus seal caused by the large change of annulus pressure in the later stage of development.

黄鹏, 杨焕强, 黄志强, 曲路路, 吴江. 环空压力对高温高压井固井二界面接触应力变化的影响[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(5): 34-37.

HUANG Peng, YANG Huanqiang, HUANG Zhiqiang, QU Lulu, WU Jiang. Effect of Annulus Pressure on Change of Contact Stress at the Two Interfaces of Cementing in High Temperature and High Pressure Wells[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(5): 34-37.

参考文献

[1] American P I. API RP 90 Annular Casing Pressure Management for Offshore Wells[ S] . Washington DC: American Petroleum Institute, 2006.
[2] Milanovic D, Smith L. A case history of sustainable annulus pressure in sour wells - Prevention, evaluation and remediation[ C] . The Woodlands, TX, United states, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2005.
[3] Zhang M, Bachu S. Review of integrity of existing wells in relation to CO₂ geological storage: What do we know[J] . International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2011,5(4) :826 - 840.
[4] Meng M, Zamanipour Z, Miska S, et al. Dynamic stress distribution around the wellbore influenced by surge /swab pressure[ J] . Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019,172:1077 - 1091 .
[5] Goodwin K J, Crook R J. Cement sheath stress failure [J] . Spe Drilling Engineering, 1992,7(4) :291 - 296.
[6] Jackson P B, Murphey C E. Effect of casing pressure on gas flow through a sheath of set cement[C] . Amsterdam, Neth, Publ by Soc of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, 1993.
[7] Therond E, Bois A, Whaley K, et al. Large - scale testing and modeling for cement zonal isolation in water - injection wells[ J] . SPE Drilling and Completion, 2017,32(4) :290 - 300.
[8] 初纬, 沈吉云, 杨云飞, 等. 连续变化内压下套管-水泥环 - 围岩组合体微环隙计算[ J] . 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(3) :379 - 385.
[9] Davies R J, Almond S, Ward R S, et al. Oil and gas wells and their integrity: Implications for shale and unconventional resource exploitation[J] . Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014,56:239 - 254.
[10] Taleghani A D, Li G, Moayeri M. Smart expandable cement additive to achieve better wellbore integrity [J] .Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME, 2017,139(6) .
[11] Li Y, Liu S, Wang Z, et al. Analysis of cement sheath coupling effects of temperature and pressure in non - uniform in - situ stress field[ C] . Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010.
[12] 王耀锋, 李军强. 套管 - 水泥环 - 地层系统应力分布规律研究[ J] . 石油钻探技术,2008(5) :7 - 11 .
[13] 杨志伏, 孟庆元, 陈晓楼, 等. 膨胀水泥环空界面径向应力理论解及实验验证[ J] . 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(5) :605 - 611 .
[14] 罗长吉, 王允良, 张彬. 固井水泥环界面胶结强度实验研究[ J] . 石油钻采工艺,1993(3) :47 - 51 .
[15] 杨燕, 杨远光. 工作液密度降低对水泥环界面胶结的影响[ J] . 石油学报,2010,31(2) :333 - 337.
[16] 李军, 陈勉, 张辉, 等. 水泥环弹性模量对套管外挤载荷的影响分析[ J] . 石油大学学报(自然科学版) , 2005(6) :41 - 44.

环空压力对高温高压井固井二界面接触应力变化的影响

Effect of Annulus Pressure on Change of Contact Stress at the Two Interfaces of Cementing in High Temperature and High Pressure Wells

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

阅读统计

本文评价

[1]	李中, 张万栋, 李炎军, 吴江, 张超, 杨昆, 张智. LD 高温高压气井井身结构优化与适用性评价[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(1): 50-56.
[2]	贾海, 王东林, 潘登, 赵智勇, 何亚彬, 陈华良, 黄靖富. 天然气井试油完井过程中快速泄压对井下工具密封性的影响[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(6): 59-64.
[3]	常杨, 郭修成, 李永钊, 匡涛. 基于随钻工程参数测量数据的钻井风险识别试验[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(5): 150-153.
[4]	张瑞. 顶部驱动液压尾管悬挂器研制与现场试验[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(4): 26-31.
[5]	刘凤和, 程长坤, 谯世均, 邢星, 吴玉杰, 杨宏伟. 气侵初期环空压力瞬态变化规律研究 [J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(2): 1-7.
[6]	严海源, 严海, 石成辉, 冯永存, 蔚宝华, 李斌, 张明, 邓金根. 南海某高温高压井剪切破裂上限压力时变规律研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2021, 44(5): 11-15.
[7]	王德坤. 川西地区超深井注水泥塞技术实践[J]. 钻采工艺, 2021, 44(5): 127-130.
[8]	韩成, 罗鸣, 刘忠宝, 杨玉豪, 邓文彪, 周庆元. 莺琼盆地半潜式平台超高温高压钻井取心技术[J]. 钻采工艺, 2021, 44(4): 28-30.
[9]	陈俊斌, 明显森, 陶怀志, 舒小波, 邵平. 页岩气水基钻井液在 YS-AB井现场试验与认识[J]. 钻采工艺, 2021, 44(4): 98-103.
[10]	张佳滢, 严俊涛, 周迎春, 张鹏, 徐璞, 张海志. 深层页岩气井高强度弹韧性水泥石力学性能研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2021, 44(4): 132-136.
[11]	王汉, 李玉飞, 蒲俊余, 唐庚, 张林, 陆林峰, 秦山. 多封隔器完井管柱优化研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(增): 8-11.
[12]	龚浩, 唐庚, 张林, 陆林峰, 张健涛. 川西地区超深高温高压气井完井试油技术研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(增): 61-63.
[13]	彭永洪, 魏波, 宋雷勇, 王甲昌, 薛健, 陈兵, 申川峡. 超深高温高压井ＡＰＲ测试工具失效分析与措施研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(5): 38-41.
[14]	胡超, 何银达, 吴云才, 吴镇江, 赵鹏, 何川江. 高压气井突发环空压力异常应对措施[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(5): 119-122.
[15]	韩成, 罗鸣, 杨玉豪, 李文拓, 邓文彪. 莺琼盆地抗高温高密度防窜水泥浆研究及应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(4): 101-104.